Sunday, July 7, 2013

No More Mr. Nice Guy?


A few days ago, a friend shared this meme thing on his Facebook page and prompted me to reconsider the age old question, "Do nice guys really finish last?"  Here are 20 reasons why they do!!!  (Note that this is why they finish last in terms of winning girl's affections, not why they bring up the rear in life in general...that would be a much longer list)

1. We care too much about how you feel. Spending too much time wondering what a girl is thinking leads to inaction. While we wonder if you actually want to go on another date or not, Joe Schmo is already asking you on your fifth. (Girls, maybe you shouldn't be so nice either and should tell Mr. Schmo you just aren't interested)

2. We put everything we have into a relationship and making our lady happy, so when it doesn't work out, we have a hard time recovering and putting ourselves out there again. We have a lot in common with investor guy who jumps off a building when the stock market crashes.

3. Safe and practical doesn't equate to sexy. Do you want a Honda or a Lamborghini? Neither, you chose the guy on a motorcycle.

4. Often times, nice is the only thing we have going for us...we are also ugly and poor. If perennial nice guy  and all-around stud James Marsden (X-Men, Superman Returns, Enchanted, The Notebook) is repeatedly jilted, what chance do us mere mortals have?

5. Jerry Magiuire was right, we live in a cynical world. Nice guys can't do their thing and be kind to a girl without her thinking there are ulterior motives. Can't we just be nice to you for sake of being nice? And if it somehow leads to you planting one on our lips, so be it...

6. If a dame we are interested in knows us well enough to be aware of our propensity for niceness, she thinks anything we do for her is just our personality and not part of some maniacal plot  to make her feel incredibly special.

7. We literally do finish last...when was the last time a nice guy won a race?

8. How many times have you heard a girl say, "I am tired of dating jerks"? On the other hand, how many times have you actually seen her date a guy who treats her like a queen and who understands her feelings? Sometimes you lady folk are like the person who says they are tired of things in life that aren't real, and then goes on a dive searching for the Loch Ness Monster. (Alright, such a person does not exist...but you get my point, right?)

9. Humility, a hallmark of the nice guy, can sometimes be perceived as a lack of confidence. We like ourselves, we just don't want you to know that.

10. At times we struggle at taking the initiative. We can be so overtly cognitive if your feelings that we do not want to cause you pain that could come from having to tell us you aren't interested or that you are dating Jo Schmo (again, why are you still dating him?)

11. Often, we fail to meet girls in the first place because we don't take the Beastie Boys advice to fight for our right to party. Instead, we fight for your right to vote. (That's happened already, huh?) We fight for your right to abort. (That's happened too?!?) We fight for your right to fight in the army. (I gotcha there didn't I? No??? Gosh darn it all) We fight for your right to emotionally eat. (There, something we can both agree on)

12. Nice guys often sacrifice our lives to save others, and the trait is slowly being bred out of society. If you are about to get hit by a moving vehicle, we push you out of the way and are hit instead. If there is a live grenade on the ground, we smother it with our body. If you are given a free ticket to a Neil Diamond concert, we offer to take the ticket instead. In other words, we don't pass Darwin's survival of the fittest test. Girl's don't naturally select us, why would Mother Nature be any different?

13. Sometimes we write blogs about our feelings instead of going on dates.

14. Many girls are suffering from "Disney Princess Syndrome" and are waiting for their prince to come rescue them without them having to do anything in terms of putting themselves out there in the dating world. Nice guys wait for a girl to give a sign that romantic feelings are reciprocated before they act on them. On a separate note, props to Disney for their new line of Princesses that take the initiative and fight for themselves (Tiana, Rapunzel, Merida). On another separate but related note, maybe nice guy's propensity for being too into Disney movies is a turn off?

15. It is in the Bible.  See Job.

16. Nice guys are notorious people pleasers.  We don't want to make one girl feel bad, so we often unintentionally lead a bunch of girls on rather focus on just one they are interested in. Nice guys don't gamble, but if we did, we would naively put one mark down on every number on the craps table and eventually lose all our chips.

17. All too often we accidentally take the fork in the road that leads to the "Friend Zone" rather than to the "Relationship Zone." Navigating through the world of dating games is tough for us amiable gentlemen.

18. We are too emotional. Girls want a shoulder to cry on, not a shoulder to cry with. For example, we don't like chick flicks because we often identify with the female lead more than you do...

19. On a related note, nice guys are usually cheery people, and there is a reason happy is synonymous with gay...some girls, in fact, believe we play for the wrong team...

20. We spend so much time pondering why we constantly finish last that we fail to realize that other guys, like Joe Schmo, have solved this puzzle, are dating a cute girl, and are nice to boot! (Ahh, that's why you are still dating him)




Thursday, July 4, 2013

Charge!

“In great deeds, something abides. On great fields, something stays. Forms change and pass; bodies disappear; but spirits linger, to consecrate ground for the vision-place of souls… generations that know us not and that we know not of, heart-drawn to see where and by whom great things were suffered and done for them, shall come to this deathless field, to ponder and dream; and lo! the shadow of a mighty presence shall wrap them in its bosom, and the power of the vision pass into their souls.” 
― Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain



On July 2, 1863 Colonel Joshua Chamberlain found himself trapped between the proverbial rock and the hard place.  He and his Maine men were in the unfortunate position of being the last regiment on the left flank of a two mile long Union line of troops that barred the Confederacy from pursuing a course to Washington D.C., and perhaps, the end of the now two and a half year long Civil War.  Although he held the high ground, an extremely beneficial position in military stratagem, his men were nearly exhausted of both spirit and ammo after being attacked repeatedly by Southern troops for hours.  Chamberlain had been told emphatically by fellow officers that he could not retreat and must fight to the end, lest enemy troops flank the Union line and sweep away the troops like a strong tide, perhaps washing away any hopes of preserving the nation and ensuring freedom for those still in chains.  However, as he looked at his men, and then down the hill at the grey coats preparing another assault, he simply found himself out of options.  Should he sound the retreat and perhaps save the lives of his comrades in arms, one of which happened to be his younger brother?  Or should he order them to fight valiantly where they stood to the last man, a heroic, but in the end pointless, sacrifice?

In essence, the weight of a war fought to ensure that the lines "all men are created equal" truly applied to all men, and even the destiny of the entire nation first forged when the Founding Father's laid quill to paper to create the immortal Constitution, found itself squarely on Chamberlain's shoulders, and luckily for posterity, he did not flinch at the strain.

Rather than be overcome by the intensity of the moment or what seemed like inevitable defeat, Chamberlain did something bold and unexpected.  He sounded the call for his troops to fix bayonets, and then ordered a charge down the mountainside and into the enemy position.  Unheard of in terms of military tactics, his higher ranking officer's mouths must have been agape when he informed them of the plan.  Charge the enemy when they are seemingly infinite in number and when you hold the high ground?  Pure folly at worst, unusual at best.  But Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain was not a "usual" soldier.

In fact, it was improbable that he ended up in the conflict at all, not to mention commanding troops at its epicenter.  He was not a fighting man, he was an academic.  He was a professor of rhetoric at esteemed Bowdoin University, and taught men how to be better communicators, not better killers.  Described as shy and reluctant by some, it was unfathomable--or as it turned out, providential--that he held a position of military leadership at all.  But Chamberlain held two hallmarks of character that made him the right person for the job at the right time: clarity of thought and empathy towards others.  He knew he could not retreat, but he also knew he must act.  Yet he also saw his men, the men he had marched with, bled with, and nearly died with, sweltering in the summer heat and frantically searching for cartridges in the belongings of their fallen comrades. So he availed himself of the only option left to him and boisterously yelled "charge" and began running down the steep mountainside with his troops, sword in hand.

Perhaps it was the fact that the enemy troops, exhausted themselves from the day's events, were taken completely off guard.  Or maybe it was the tenacity with which the Maine boys swept down the mountainside, wheeling from left  to right in order catch any Southern troops in the vicinity.  Whatever the case, the "Lion of Little Round Top" made a courageous decision when the fate of the entire nation was in the balance, and he ended up tipping the scales in favor of the Republic's preservation.  He would later receive the Medal of Honor, the highest award given to a soldier, and would go onto serve after the war's end as Governor of Maine and President of Bowdoin College

It is important to remember that tomorrow marks not only our nation's independence, but also the sesquicentennial of the end of the climactic Battle of Gettysburg.  There are so many stories of bravery and selflessness from both sides during the three day struggle that ultimately changed the course of history, but ever since I became fascinated with this event as a teenager, Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain has been one of my personal heroes, not just because the part he played on the grand stage of our nation's history, or who he was as a person (both of which were admirable), but because in a moment of extreme chaos and calamity, he had the courage to act rather than be acted upon.

How many times in our life are we placed in a stressful situation and we simply sit around and wait for circumstances to get better?  I know it is a personal bad habit of mine to figuratively crawl into the fetal position and cut myself off from the world around me when faced with extreme challenges.  Like the frog in a pot of boiling water, I feel the temperature of life's turmoils increase, but rather than take action and escape, I grow comfortable with not taking action at all.  How much more healthy would it be if, rather than simply wait and let life act on me, or even worse, retreat from my problems completely, I followed Chamberlain's example and charged them head on?  Even more poignant, how much more of an impact could I have on the world around me if I wasn't afraid of what other's thought or whether and simply acted in the manner that was best?

I love history because, when taught well, it should be the most engaging of stories;  a tapestry woven with the actions of heroes and individuals that we can look at and learn from.  The actions of figures long left behind by the annals of time can be remembered, and as Chamberlain said, "their vision can pass into our souls."  So as you remember those who fought and who are currently fighting to preserve the pillars of liberty we as nation hold dear, remember not only what they did, but the lessons they were trying to teach us.  Like the lesson that an unassuming teacher from Maine taught 150 years ago: that sometimes when life seems like it is beating down furiously upon you, when you are being plagued by column after column of quandaries, sometimes you have to bravely take a step forward and charge into the fire in order to avoid getting burned.

Happy Day of Independence!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(If you made it to the end of my bloviating, I commend you and I apologize for the many grammatical errors you were sure to have encountered.  In my defense, I am writing this at one in the morning and decided that I could not give my tired brain rest until I finished.  On the other hand, it is sad to think that a post dedicated to one of my heroes, who happened to be a professor of language, would be riddled with errors that would most likely make him cringe.  So if you are looking down from the great haven in the sky JCL, or if you are one of the 4 people that actually read this post, I am sorry!!!)

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

The Retreat


I had not been away very long, and yet my body trembled with a great sense of loss.  The trenches have that effect, or so I am told, and after all that I have observed in a short period of time, so I believe.  Each shell landing with immense power, each whistle that sounds the charge, each bullet whizzing by your helpless frame reminds you exactly how mortal you are.  Death is an ever present shadow; every stone you left unturned before arriving in the battle torn wasteland and every dream you yet hope to fulfill becomes an obsession in the trenches.

This maelstrom of anxiety has prompted me to record my ruminations about the past, the present, and the future.  I hope, perhaps in vain, that words can bring peace to my soul; a peace that is absent in a world of wanton violence and destruction. 

My soul…what is that? I once thought it to be a thing of great importance, central to the progression of all life.   I once believed that God had great things in store for me, that his mighty hands had placed me in this exact place and this exact time for an exact purpose.  But that now seemed the distant past, and eternity even, when the naïve hopes of a boy collided with the stark reality of manhood.  They tell you that more years bring more wisdom…I do not know whether this is true, but they do not bring more optimism.  Any wisdom I have gained has taught me that life is cruel, an illusion without end, a bleak, manipulative, horrifying prospect. 

A slight drizzle brings me away from these incessant and forlorn contemplations.  It seems that rain is invariably connected to the trench…even when moisture does not fall on us from above, the dreariness that precludes and exists within a storm is ever present.  The drizzle bangs against my helmet like a battle drum, constantly reminding my comrades and I of our desperate and gloomy circumstances.

The rain itself is not the worst part of a storm, at least in a soldier’s eyes.  It is the pool of mud it creates.  Mud is one of the most dogged foes of those who dwell in the trench.  It drowns us, consumes us, and leaves its stains to scar us.  When the charge sounds, it is mud that hampers our movement, and with one ill move, brings us to the ground never to escape its grimy confines.  There were no tombs here to inter the noble souls who died doing this woesome work, mud was our only grave, our shroud between this world and the next. 

This was not my hope for a journal, what a pathetic attempt this is? I hoped that by writing down my feelings I could find some source of illumination in the darkness…some enduring kernel of truth.  Instead, I fill these pages with the complaints of a wounded soul…the whining of a weak wanderer.  What use does this have to me or anyone else?

I sit straight up, hoping that by adjusting my position I can also shift my frame of mind.  But sitting straight up is a dismal process in a rain soaked trench, the slosh of the mud quickly brings you back down to your previous position.  Perhaps the most frequent battle a soldier wages is to ever find a comfortable niche in his drab surroundings.

Come to think of it, had I ever been in a comfortable position before.  I remember months ago, it seems like years, waking up in to the cool, crisp morning air in a feathered bed with satin sheets.  Surely that was comfortable? But I remember my psyche during this period and all physical peace seems to be dwarfed by the feelings of anxiety that engulfed me.  I look at the previous morning’s paper, the overbearing headline “WAR FINDS EUROPE” readily visible at its top.  The frantic thoughts that raced across my mind come back to me in a flood, like guilt rushes over its victim before confession.  More than anything, I remember the vague sense of horror this headline produced.  War had found Europe, would it find me?

It should not have come as that great of a shock, world events had pointed to a cataclysmic outbreak of some kind, but that morning’s headline caught me much like the sound of an exploding shell in the trenches, though I knew it was coming I could not prepare for the sonorous sound of its arrival. 

If this dribble is ever in fact perused, please understand one thing from the beginning.  I am a coward.  My response to any uncomfortable thought is to run away from it, to escape, to find solace in some distant fantasy.   Upon reading this headline, a deep wave of patriotism did not fall over me.  I did not take action and run to the nearest enlistment station to declare my unwavering support.  I did not, in fact, do anything except retreat back into the comfort of my satin sheets.  You may wonder how I ended up in a trench, 200 yards from an enemy prepared to bring about my death.  I often wonder that myself.  Like most cowards, running away from what I dreaded brought me right where I didn’t want to be.  I chose not to control events in my life, and by doing so, I let them control me.  Like Jonah, I tried to escape from any sense of duty, but found myself whale deep in it. 

I come from a distinguished family, one that had a propensity to stand up against injustice and fight for what they had believed in over centuries.  My mother often told me the story of one of our distant ancestors of valor who stoically awaited his death on the shores of England at the hands of the Spanish Armada, and as his reward, found salvation in the Provident Wind.   I never really found out about the validity of this story, but the moral my mother sought to leave me with has been ingrained in my mind ever since, my own personal scarlet letter.  “Even in times of hopelessness, God rewards the brave and faithful.”

I adore my parents.  Many of my thoughts are directed towards them during these desperate times.  But perhaps my unbinding love for them is the base of my never ending guilt for being an ugly duckling, the son who could never live up to their well-founded but misguided expectations.  If I did not love or respect them, that means I would not love and respect all that they stood for, which in my mind, was everything beautiful.  If I did not love them, I could say that my not being courageous or penitent in the face of danger was simply a product of a rebellion against two trite figures.  But I do love them, and thus must be confronted with everlasting shame that I did not embrace the values they sought to distill upon me. 

I remember the shouts of my brothers after retreating back under the covers, pulling me back into reality.  I was only 16, my brothers were all older, like the rest of the country, were eager to be consumed by the fire of patriotism.  I loved my country as well, or at least thought I did, but unlike them, I remained unfettered by the passion that had seemingly consumed the nation like a tsunami.  I would like to say it was because I was a pacifist; that my lack of jingoistic joy was principle founded; that I was taking a stand against violence.  My lack of enthusiasm for war, however, was more a product of my lack of enthusiasm for taking a stand in general.  Here was my chance to measure up, to put behind me the adolescent years marked by indifference and apathy, but I responded by not responding. 

Eventually, I muddled my way out of bed and towards the breakfast table.  As with all large families, especially those with a wealth of testosterone, meals seemed to be a battle in themselves—although the use of that term makes me cringe knowing what I do now.  Because I had arrived late, I had lost this battle before it had even started…the prospects for a filling breakfast vanished almost as quickly as my hopes that my entrance would go unnoticed.

“Have you heard the news yet?” My father asked with a pinch of pride and excitement in his voice.

“How could I not?” was my quick response “trying to sleep in this morning was like trying to take a nap at the Exchange.”

“Ah, come off it, sleeping can be done anytime! Now is the time for celebration!” Remarked my eldest brother jubilantly.

“Yes, and I wanted to celebrate with breakfast”

“Well, leave it to you to spoil the excitement with your doom and gloom,” was his matter of fact retort. 

Looking back, these mornings all seemed to pass in the same perfunctory haze.  The only thing that changed was the raucous crowd that welcomed me into the world, or at times, patronized me into participating in it.  One by one, my elder brothers were called off to war crops in a field being picked for harvest.  This once great nation had indeed been harvested, my eldest brother has sense passed performing a duty that he had once entreated me to celebrate.  How many more brothers, sons, husbands had passed during the course of this “great” war.  Yes, the men of this country had been harvested…and for what purpose?

Eight months after I awoke to find the world embroiled in conflict, it was my turn to offer service to my country, an opportunity I sought every opportunity to avoid.  “You will make such a great soldier,” my mother would often remark, “you look like one even now.”  Perhaps I did, but I did not feel like one.  I was a scholar.  My family and friends encouraged me incessantly to volunteer like my friends and brothers had before.  The reality of war may have begun to hit the mainland, but my country was still possessed by a jingoist fever. “Dulce et decorum est.  Tis sweet and meet to die for one’s country.”

There was nothing sweet about these trenches.  I looked around at my compatriots trapped in the tunnels like I.  One was reading in his bible.  I often admired this man.  He was brave in the face of combat, and I had once seen him risk his life to carry a fellow soldier to safety.  He seemed to be able to look death in the eye and mark him as his equal.  The pages of his bible had been folded and refolded to mark what I assumed to be passages of import and its outside was caked in mud like almost all of a soldiers possessions.  He flipped frantically through the pages, I almost asked him what he was searching for, but decided not to disturb his study.  I wonder how he can even read in what had now become a downpour? Maybe he can’t, maybe the mere idea of examining words of solace was enough to calm an anguished soul. 

Other soldiers were engaged in traditional downtime activities.  Often the recruitment posters make a soldiers life out as exciting and glamorous, but what they don’t tell you is that you spend more time combating boredom than the enemy on the other side of the trench.  The important caveat being that boredom could not kill you of course, or at least we all hoped not. 

My life before the war was not an exciting one of incessant activity either.  Preoccupied with my studies, I did not participate in many of the enterprises of my peers.  Honestly, the thought of interacting with a group of unknown people at a social gathering terrified me almost as much as the prospect of death.  I had a few close friends and that was enough.  I wonder where they are now?

Invariably, thoughts of my friends brought my mind exactly to a point I wanted to avoid.  Or did I? I realized I still had her letter in the front pocket of my coat, why hadn’t I thrown it away? Perhaps having this paltry possession from her made me oblivious to the fact that it was over, that I would never embrace her again like I had hoped. 

I met her at a dance; what our French allies would call a soirée.  How I arrived there remains a mystery to me, much like how I have arrived here in the trench.  A hermit lives a complicated life, one much more difficult than most realize.  He constantly avoids attention and interaction, and yet in his deepest part of his soul, these two things are what he craves the most.  It is the inability, or the fear of achieving these comforts that prompt him to retreat from the world. 

I often wonder why they still held dances while men were fighting and dying across the Channel.  It is remarkable to me that the times when humanity tries hardest to pretend that life can continue on its regular pace are the exact points at which it has been irrevocably altered.  Regardless, there I stood, anxiously looking around for an opportunity of escape.  I found it, and quickly retreated from the terrace to a bench just outside.  I sat there for many minutes, perhaps hours, when a figure approached and sat to my right. 
“Well this is a strange place to spend a party? Peaceful though, I’ll give you that!” She exclaimed boldy.

“Ha, peace is the only thing I crave at the moment.”

“You came to the wrong place then”

“I live in the wrong place at the wrong time,” I thought to myself.

Clearly, she expected me to make some attempt at conversation like many of her admirers would have.  She was beautiful to be sure, but that made the prospect of carrying on a conversation with her all the more difficult.  I quickly looked away from her and turned my gaze pensively to the distance.

A few moments passed before—to my horror—she began talking again.  Rather, I should say to my awe, because I soon discovered her words to be of such a crystalline character and her entire persona of such a radiance, that I started to consider myself Adam gazing upon Eve, realizing his full human potential for the first time.  Realizing it but not able to see it fulfilled.  I just listened, I did not say a word—not because I did not want to, but because like Prufrock, I did not dare.  Ironically, perhaps it was this trait of silence that differentiated me from the other fish in the proverbial sea.  Soon we began swimming through life together, and for perhaps the first time, I felt truly at peaceful—truly blissful—truly  hopeful. 

In her I found my constant.  Often unable to confide in those closest to me about the most trivial of matters, I found that I could pour out the entirety of my soul and this most beautiful of vessels would receive it with care.  I could trust her.  I even told her about my fears of serving in the war, to which she often said with a sly smile, “you getting shot, mangled, or gassed does not suit me very well either.”  And so I passed a few months oblivious to the chaos of the outside world.  Too short.

As I previously mentioned in this account, my brother passed in the service of his country.  Rather than feeling disdain towards an event that had taken their firstborn away from them, my parents increased their recruitment efforts tenfold.  There was something to be admired in this.  In the face of such terror and overwhelming grief they responded with hope and courage.  Why was I not more like them?  This guilt, mingled with the misguided idea of avenging my brother’s death, prompted me to enlist shortly thereafter.  Misguided, I say, because I would never confront his true killer.  How can you confront an idea?

I met with my beloved the night before I was to embark.  It remains the greatest night of my life.  Amidst the sorrow, the worry, the sense of the unknown, I gazed into her eyes and saw an immovable beacon, my Ruth, and as I brought her letter out of my pocket, my Guinevere.  It had only been 5 short months from that night, that glorious twilight eve, when made promises that two young souls—destined to be separated—should never solemnize.  Perhaps I always knew that she would not, or could not, wait for me, but words cannot describe the unbearable pain that coursed through my soul to open up a much anticipated letter and find it commencing with the words, “I am to be married.”  I know not what the rest of the post said, perhaps some angelic words entreating my forgiveness.   I had forgiven her—immediately in fact—but I could not forgive myself for being in a place that left me buried in mud rather than in her loving embrace. 

A shell announced its arrival with a shrill shriek, like a Banshee announcing her arrival to its involuntary victim, and I was immediately brought back to my current circumstances.  Usually artillery fire preceded or coincided with an enemy’s charge, was this the case now or was the enemy simply testing our defenses?
My question was answered almost immediately as it was conceived, it was indeed preparation for an attack—one that should be easily repelled.  I say easily with some trepidation because this will, no doubt, engender confidence in our commanders and perhaps prompt them to sound a counter attack.  I only have a few minutes left as the charge was just repelled.  As the enemy began its charge, I moved to my position at our trenches precipice and prepared, like my compatriots, to bring about the work of death.  I began firing frantically at the enemy.  The scene was a cacophonous symphony of fatality.  Gunfire, artillery, bold shouts of those seeking to fend off their end, painful screams of those being carried into death’s arms.  Amidst this chaos, I had a moment of clarity.  I saw my enemy…I saw a man slip in the mud as he charged our position.  Rather than stay down and perhaps wait out the attack, or crawl into a retreat, he fought against the mud and rose to his feet, at which point he was struck and fell limply to the ground.  Why? Why did he continue to fight? What hope did he have? From where did he take courage?

He made a decision.  He decided to keep going.  He refused to become entombed within the mud; it is time I cease to be paralyzed by fear.  When our charge is sounded, I will make a charge of my own.  I will charge home.

****Like an old, wizened man weary of visiting the sins of his youth, I have been fearful of recounting my experiences in the trench again.  Yet years later, here I am, writing an addendum to these words.  As the horn sounded signaling the counter attack, and my fellow soldiers climbed out of the trench and began rushing towards the enemy and their doom, I went to the opposite side of the trench, climbed out, and began charging in the polar direction.  After rushing, or I should say, sloshing a few feet, a bullet struck me in the back and I fell.  I struggled to fight to my feet, to resist being buried in the mud, but my strength failed me and I collapsed.  I know not how long I waited there in the mud, an eternity it seemed, until I sensed, even in my pain and weariness, shadows crouching besides me.

“What is the bloke doing out here?” A voice exclaimed emphatically.

“Isn’t it obvious? The coward was running away!”

“Running away? Where did he think he was going?”

“Away from here? What doesn’t matter, he’s a coward all the same.”

“Do you think he’ll live?”

“His breathing is shallow.  I guess that’s up to God.”

The other soldier, I imagine scanning the desolate field of battle, remarked, “No, it’s up to him.”  He was right.  With the Grace of God, I chose life. 

Monday, February 11, 2013

A Lesson in Leadership

"Every human being is entitled to courtesy and consideration.  Constructive criticism is not only to be expected but sought." -Margaret Chase Smith

 As the first woman to serve in both the House of Representatives and Senate, Margaret Chase Smith was probably used to hearing her fair share of criticism both from colleagues and the general public.  Forging a path for women seeking a larger voice in politics, she naturally encountered backward thinking men whose opinions held sway during the 40s, 50s, and 60s.  It is remarkable, then, that she would push past the chauvinism  to become one of the first and most influential critics of McCarthyism from within the Republican Party.  It is of even more merit, however, that she could offer those words of wisdom on criticism after she probably experienced her fair share of unfounded, unwanted, and uncouth judgement from the "gentleman's club" that was Congress at the time.

What Smith realized, and what many struggle to see even to this day, is that having mistakes or problems illuminated for you, and learning from them, is one of the best ways a human being can evolve into something more than a sack of skin and bones with a pulse.

I am of the opinion that one of the most grandiose aspirations a person could have is to be, in someway a leader; meaning they influenced others and society--even in a small, benign way--to be better.  This could be something as simple as being a leader in the home.  It could mean leading in the workforce.  It could mean being outspoken and inspirational in word.  It could mean being a silent example, a pillar of light for those around you to follow and gain insight from.

I don't think, however, that anyone can be an effective leader unless they are willing and able to take criticism from others.  How can someone seek to influence the behavior of others if they are not willing to change their own behavior first?  Recognizing one's weaknesses, and analyzing how they can be improved upon, is an essential part to becoming a skilled leader.

I have arrived at this point of frustration because of my own observations on criticism within the teaching profession.  As a first year teacher, it has been eye opening to me to see how many of my colleagues are unable to use criticism they receive in a mature, beneficial manner.  Whether its a teacher being told by an administrator things they are doing wrong in the classroom, a school administrator being shown problems in the way an issue is being handled, or a district official being asked why we are approaching education using certain strategies,  it seems to me that there is an inability for many in the system to handle constructive criticism.  In essence, we as educators are quick to point out faults and points of improvement in our students and their work, but we often fail or refuse to do the same when it comes to ourselves.

I am approaching this as an imperfect observer, not someone who has mastered the art of being able to use criticism effectively.  I remember back to my second week of teaching.  Although as naive as Icharus as he built the wings that would eventually take him fatally close to the sun and as stressed as a gimp would be in a zombie apocalypse, I thought that I was doing a pretty good job overall.  My students seemed to like me and I felt like I had started to lay the foundation for meaningful instruction throughout the year.  It came as a total shock, then, to have one of my 8th graders--a ruffian at the time--tell me that I couldn't teach because I said the word, "okay" too much.  Initially I was furious with him.  He interrupted my instruction and he had the gall to do it in front of the entire class.  Ironically, my response to him was, "please be respectful, Juan.  Okay?" I went home that day feeling awful and embarrassed.  But then I had the chance to ruminate a bit more on what he told me and realized that he was right.  I did say "okay" too much as I was instructing, it was a nervous tick, and it was something that I needed to recognize and improve on.  I thanked Juan the next day for pointing this out to me and asked my students to stop me whenever I said that.  Although it still escapes my lips occasionally, I have been able to improve upon communication with the class and become a more effective teacher.

It can be difficult to take constructive feedback from others, especially those we deem ill-equipped to criticize: like a fourteen year old boy who should be, at all times, subordinate to his teacher.  I can imagine how hard it is for a principal or superintendent to be judged by teachers or school officials working under them.  However, if we are able to separate ourselves from our emotions and not take such critiques as an affront to our character, than these critiques, regardless of where they come from, could be used as tools for improvement not only on an interpersonal level, but within the entire educational system.  Often, I fear, we are so adept at being offended that we miss the opportunity to be cultivated.

The lack of leadership stemming from an inability to take criticism is not a problem seen solely in the educational world, it is a societal epidemic, and the underlying symptom is that we are becoming a society that is capable of complaining, but not capable of improving.  Attend any faculty meeting or teacher training and you will find people as adept as any at pointing out faults of individuals and of a system in general, but you will not find people that are capable of using this new found knowledge to find a solution.  If you watch the news, read about happenings in government, or even scroll up and down your Facebook newsfeed, you will find many more people who are capable complainers but not capable critical thinkers.

Part of the problem, I believe, is linked to my last blog post on how you present your criticism in the first place.  As teachers, I find that sometimes our critiques and complaints are so emotionally charged and venomous that they naturally fall on deaf ears, and are, therefore, not constructive.  As stated at the beginning of the article, criticism needs to be prefaced with "courtesy and consideration" before it can become constructive.

However, emotional boorishness does not only impede the ability of an observer to offer effective criticism, it can also prevent the recipient of helpful critiques from learning the intended lesson.  I find that, many times, those in leadership positions take critiques as a personal affront or an assault on their character.  They become churlish and ignorant because they cannot see the bigger picture.  How many more problems could be solved in more meaningful ways if so called "leaders"--instead of becoming offended, used critiques and the excavation of problems as an opportunity to open up a dialogue on how an issue could best be resolved.  Our students would be in better hands with their teachers, our children would be in better hands with their parents, and we as individuals would be better at self-evaluation.

In short, I believe we would personally reap the rewards of recognizing our own personal faults and improving upon them, and society would harvest the fruits of developing leaders capable of evaluating errors in a system and correcting them.  Until this happens, and we continue to be inept at personal and collective revision, the education system and leadership worldwide will continue to receive a failing grade.

Monday, January 21, 2013

The Path of Best Resistance

Today, although dubbed a minor holiday by some, we celebrate a man who was anything but minor in terms of how he shaped history.  Although not perfect and not by any means the sole architect of the Civil Right's Movement, Dr. King became the face and voice for freedom when this country needed it the most.  We still might not be in a societal Shangri La, but through him a promise began to be fulfilled that was mandated in blood a century earlier during the Civil War: that mankind could have a free and equal opportunity to pursue their dream regardless of their culture, beliefs, or skin color.

It is easy to focus on the end results of the efforts of King and others because they were paramount to a change in a cultural ideology, but even more telling is a glimpse into his methods.  Taking a cue from a philosophy put into words by Henry David Thoreau and put into action by Mahatma Gandhi, King embraced nonviolent resistance to achieve his goals.  He recognized what many of his contemporaries could not, that belligerency and violence would only compound the obstacles African-Americans faced on the path towards social adequation by reinforcing the negative, false stereotypes white America had of minorities.

Even though many in this nation have come to embrace the idea of a "peaceful protest," Dr. King's methods still have yet to be fully harnessed in today's world--not just in terms of passive resistance in action--but in terms of a need for non-antagonistic speech.

When people think of the Civil Right's Movement King envisioned, they probably picture him giving his "I Have a Dream Speech," Rosa Parks refusing to budge in Montgomery, or black students realizing the ruling of Brown vs. The Topeka Board of Education and attending a previously "white only" school in Arkansas.  But it was the rhetoric of King and not just the actions of those who echoed his philosophy that allowed the downtrodden to rise up to a place of equal footing on the social ladder.

Martin Luther King Jr. and his constituents found success where John Brown and Malcolm X did not because he saw the pitfalls of portraying those he disagreed with, or even was completely at odds with, as absolute enemies.  He chose the communicative path of love and reconciliation rather than hate and vitriol.  In essence, he realized that using loaded language and employing a terse temper would only push both sides farther apart rather than closer together.

I started contemplating how important this decision was while watching, of all things, "The Lorax" with my 7th grade students. A benign movie to be sure and based on the Dr. Seuss book, the movie is laced with environmentalist themes that, for the most part, hit home with the viewer.  However, the Lorax himself fails to convince The Once-Ler to change his ways and quit harming his natural surroundings in part, I believe, because of how he delivers his message.  Instead of explaining in a rational, calm, and understanding way how the Thneed salesmen's actions will have detrimental consequences, the Lorax is loud, aggressive, and antagonizes the Once-Ler and his family with insulting diatribes.  He even goes so far as to send the potential beneficiary of his advice literally, "down the river."  Admittedly, I have since wondered why I am looking so closely and critically at an innocent and fun children's movie, but it is often through the most simple materials that the mind is prompted to engage in discerning thought.

Imagine if people learned from the mistakes of "The Lorax" and many ardent advocates of social change, both past and present, and instead adopted the tactics of Dr. King.  How much better of a world would we be living in if instead spouting belligerent barbs we instead utilized words of healing that would bind rather than break.  A partisan Congress wouldn't be deadlocked on a multitude of important issues while the nation hopes for improvements, the internet could be a venue of social debate and reform rather than a platform for venom, and on an even more micro-social level, broken families could be brought back together instead of split asunder.

Instead, we listen to the media focus on sensationalist stories using dramatic jargon, we listen to music and watch material that emphasizes and even embraces conflict and violence, and we use social technology as an outlet for venting insults and perpetuating extreme views.  The other side isn't just wrong, it is the devil incarnate.  Barack Obama isn't misguided on some issues, he is a Socialist Thug hellbent on dragging America into the gutter.  Pro-choice Americans are baby killers without a single care for human life.  Advocates of gun control are usurpers of the Constitution.  Supporters of Gay rights are evil to the core and absolute antagonists to the will of God.  Seekers of environmental reform are deranged hippies without an ounce of understanding of what it takes to live in the modern world. And on...and on...and on.

Although I consider myself an Independent in terms of party affiliation, I admittedly sway to the right on most social issues.  I don't support an amendment to redefine marriage, I am pro-life, I disagree with Obama's current stance on gun control, and I don't think the world in facing impending doom because of Greenhouse gases.  However, I also am a Lutheran--not in terms of religious belief--but rhetorical reasoning.  Nothing in the world is going to be changed for the better through painting an abominable caricature of the opposing side and pushing the wedge that has created a chasm between two groups further down.

If you don't believe hateful speech  plagues society, simply look over your Facebook Feed, peruse some Tweets, read a "news" article--or better yet--scroll down to the comment section of said article.  It seems that mocking and abuse are the current tools of choice to seek change rather than conciliatory correspondence or polite, but meaningful, debate.

Now this long and bloated piece of blogging is not advocating the adoption of the philosophy, "everyone's views have merit" or "just be patient and things will eventually get better."  No, that is not what I am not saying at all.  Anything important in history has come about because of hard work and action.  At times it has even become necessary for man to take up arms and fight for what dialogue could not achieve.  However, taciturn stereotypes, misguided labels, and antagonistic rhetoric has and will never be the best vehicles of improvement.  That's what Dr. King taught us.  That's why we honor his memory.

We live in a tumultuous time in which, it seems, we seem on the precipitous of calamity on many issues.  In many instances, it seems our interaction with others, especially those we disagree with, seeks to push us over the edge into chaos and anarchy rather than back into the arms of civility and reason.  That's why the Minister from Atlanta's legacy has never been so important to remember.

So in this month of resolution making, make a commitment to be softer in tone and more considerate in action.  Rather than having the emotional perception of a sea sponge, try to empathize with those you thought you could never empathize with.  When engaging in necessary debate, use phrases like, "I understand where you are coming from, but..." or "I think your position has merit, but this is what I believe and why."  Try to walk a mile in someone else's shoes.  Mend rather than tear apart.  Reconcile rather than rudely remonstrate.  Do this and you will be sharing the same dream King echoed nearly fifty years ago.  Do this and you can change the world.

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Why the Blah?

There is nothing a solitary spirit desires more than affection.  I don’t have it…I am lost, I am broken, I am in a funk that cannot be affected and I am struggling to keep going…but I know that out there, somewhere, anywhere, is someone I can love and who will love me.  She will be my everything, my universe, my panacea.  I want her here now.  I want to be hers.  I want her to be mine.  I want to hold her in my arms and adore her without condition.  No matter this frail existence’s tremulous and turbulent waters, I want us to find solace in the fact that we will always sail on together…sometimes drifting.  

I don’t know when she will arrive.  I pray to god that it will be soon.  Faith is tricky though.  It requires not only belief in something external, but something internal as well.  In order to believe in God and his timing, I have to believe in myself.  I have to believe in my eternal worth and that what I feel, at times, to be a withered shell of a soul was,  in actuality, a beacon forged in the cosmos—unending  light.  If I believe I have a purpose, than I believe that God created me with a reason…if I believe God created me for a reason, I can trust that he knows how to navigate the treacherous shoals until I arrive at the desired port.  

Maybe my purpose is not to be adored and loved by my eternal ally at age 25.  Maybe it is.  Maybe the girl I am hoping will call me right now has not even given me a single, brief musing this entire day, or maybe the same frenetic anxieties have enveloped her mind as well. Maybe I am destined to walk this world alone a little longer…or a lot longer…but maybe not.  I forge my own path, but God knows best what shape my journey should take and when the turning points will manifest.   With his help I can navigate this or any nexus in my life.  My trust in him keeps me going because I know that, eventually, he will lead me through the siren’s song—in whatever form it takes—to my Portia.